Lalita Parshuram Vitkar v. State Of Maharashtra

6a. cri appa 785-16.doc RMA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 785 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 459 OF 2016 Lalita Parshuram Vitkar ..

Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ..

Respondent ...................

Appearances Ms. Sarojini Upadhyay Advocate (appointed) for the Applicant Mrs. U.V.Kejriwal APP for the State ...................

CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.

DATE : JULY 7, 2016.

P.C.:

1.

Heard both sides.

2.

This is an application for condonation of delay caused in filing the appeal.

3.

Looking to the fact that the application and the appeal have been preferred through jail and the other facts and jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2

6a. cri appa 785-16.doc circumstances of this case, we are of the opinion that in the interest of justice, delay deserves to be condoned. Accordingly delay is condoned.

4.

Application is allowed in the above terms.

[ MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ] jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 2