← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/7581/2016dissmiss for defaultnonprosecution

Shri. Ravindra Bhimrao Takle v. The Deputy Director Of Education And ORS

2019-01-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.C. Dharmadhikari2 pages

23. 7581-16.doc DDR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7581 OF 2016 Ravindra Bhimrao Takle ..Petitioner Vs.

The Deputy Director of Education Pune Division & ors.

..Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7936 OF 2015 Vaishali Rajendra Suryawanshi ..Petitioner Vs.

Shree Chhatrapati Shikshan Sanstha & ors.

..Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8260 OF 2017 Vilas Baburao Dombale ..Petitioner vs.

Shree Chhatrapati Shikshan Sanstha & ors.

..Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10601 OF 2014 Baban Ramchandra Dhobale ..Petitioner vs.

Shree Chhatrapati Shikshan Sanstha & ors.

..Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10609 OF 2014 Sitaram Dinkar More ..Petitioner vs.

Shree Chhatrapati Shikshan Sanstha & ors.

..Respondents 1/2

23. 7581-16.doc ............

None for the petitioners.

Mr. S.B. Kalel, AGP for State.

Mr. A.P. Kulkarni for respondent No.2.

............

CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & M.S. KARNIK, JJ.

DATE : 8th JANUARY, 2019 P.C. :

The petitioners' advocates are absent. We repeatedly enquired, how in the absence of any leave note or reasonable or justifiable cause, can the petitioners and their advocates remain absent and that too when the Petitions are filed in the year 2014.

2.

No cogent reason has been assigned for the absence of the petitioners' advocates. We are not bound to adjourn the matters, which are pending in this Court for more than four years.

3.

The Writ Petitions are, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution.

(M.S. KARNIK, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) 2/2