Nooruddin Ismail Qureshi v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

by SHAGUFTA QUTBUDDIN PATHAN Date:

2024.02.01 16:22:49 +0530 SHAGUFTA QUTBUDDIN PATHAN 8-WP-1368-2021.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1368 OF 2021 Nooruddin Ismail Qureshi ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents Mr. Sagar P. Batavia for the Petitioner Ms. P. P. Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2-State None for the Respondent Nos. 3 & 4 CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.

WEDNESDAY, 31 st JANUARY 2024 P.C :

The petitioner only presses for prayer clause (C), which reads thus :

"C) That investigation of Complaints/ representations of Petitioner against false FIR No. 367 of 2008 dated 27.6.2008 lodged by the Respondent No. 3 which needs to be conducted and so matter be transferred to Central Bureau of Investigation or any other Independent Agency." SQ Pathan 1/2

8-WP-1368-2021.doc Learned A.P.P states that the police, after investigation in C.R. No. 367/2008 have filed a `B' Summary report in the Court having jurisdiction.

Considering that a `B' Summary report has been filed in C.R. No. 367/2008 lodged by respondent No. 3 as against the petitioner, nothing survives for further consideration in the petition. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner makes a grievance against the police officers that they registered a false case as against the petitioner.

Needless to state that it is open for the petitioner to challenge the order passed by the police complaint's authority, before the appropriate forum.

MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

SQ Pathan 2/2