Dhananjay Madhav Saokar v. Natesh Pandurang Shinde And ORS.

43.APPLN.314-14.doc FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION [APPLN] NO.314 OF 2014 [Dhananjay Madhav Saokar Vs. Natesh P. Shinde and ors.] _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, Court's or Judge's Orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Mr. Harshad Sathe i/b. Harshad Bhadbhade, for the applicant. Smt. Anamika Malhotra, APP, for the State.

CORAM : A. R. JOSHI, J.

DATE : 10th AUGUST, 2015 P.C. :- 1.

As per earlier office report, notices against respondent Nos.1 and 2 are returned duly served. However, none present for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant in this application for condonation of delay of 9 days. 2.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the application is allowed and disposed of. Delay is condoned. Fresh notices be issued against respondent Nos.1 and 2 on the application for leave to file appeal challenging acquittal of the respondents in the matter of offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Private service is allowed. Learned APP for respondent No.3- State waives service. Stand over to 7th September, 2015.

(A.R. JOSHI, J.) 1 / 1