Pushpa Pranlal Talati And ORS v. Rupal Dhiren Talati And ANR

DAE 901-A-APL-895-2022.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 895 OF 2022 Pushpa Pranlal Talati and Ors.

...Applicants

Versus

Rupal Dhiren Talati and Anr.

...Respondents

Mr. Parsad Badole Advocate for Applicants.

Mr. Viral J. Bhanushali i/by Ms. Smita Gajul for Respondent No.1. Mr. S. S. Hulke, APP for Respondent-State.

API. Sachin Patil attached to Pantnagar Police Station is present. CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND PRAKASH D.NAIK, JJ.

by DNYANESHWAR ASHOK ETHAPE Date:

2023.04.24 10:50:30 +0530 DNYANESHWAR ASHOK ETHAPE DATE : 19th APRIL 2023.

P.C.:- 1.

Learned Advocate for the Applicants, on instructions seeks leave to withdraw present Application qua Applicant No.1, Pushpa Pranlal Talati and Applicant No.2, Jigna Pranlal Talati.

Leave granted.

2.

Application is disposed off as withdrawn qua Applicant Nos. 1 and 2. 3.

As far as Applicant No.3, Vaishali Pranlal Talati is concerned, perusal of F.I.R. indicates that, except making passing references with allegations of general nature, no other serious allegations are made against her by the Respondent No.1.

4.

In view thereof, Application is admitted qua Applicant No.3, Vaishali 1/2

DAE 901-A-APL-895-2022.doc Pranlal Talati only.

5.

As and by way of interim relief, investigation of the present crime i.e. C.R. No. 27 of 2022 dated 14th January 2022 registered with Pant Nagar Police Station, Mumbai is stayed qua Applicant No.3, Vaishali Pranlal Talati only.

6.

The Investigating Agency is permitted to proceed with the investigation and to file final report qua other accused persons. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (A. S. GADKARI, J.) 2/2