Anil Kumar @ Manoj Kumar Mishrilal Rajbhar v. State Of Maharashtra

19-BA-1944-2022.doc D.A.Ethape

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1944 OF 2022 Anil Kumar @ Manoj Kumar Mishrilal Rajbhar ...Applicant

Versus

State Of Maharashtra

...Respondent

__________ Mr. Rumman Shaikh a/w Mr. Husen Shaikh Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Y. Y. Dabke, APP for Respondent-State.

__________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

by ETHAPE DNYANESHWAR ASHOK Date: 2023.09.05 17:38:51 +0530 DATE : 4th SEPTEMBER, 2023 ETHAPE DNYANESHWAR ASHOK P.C.:

1.

Heard learned Counsel for the Applicant and learned APP. 2.

Learned APP on instructions submits that, the accused has been convicted by trial Court hence, this application has become infructuous. 3.

Learned counsel for the Applicant is admitted this fact. 4.

In view of the above, application is rejected and disposed off as infructuous.

[SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.]