Satish Kumar Manchanda And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2266 OF 2016 Satish Kumar Manchanda and Another.

..Petitioners.

Versus

State of Maharashtra & Another.

..Respondents.

Mr. Sushil Upadhyay i/b A. M. Sarogi for the Petitioner. Ms. S. D. Shinde, APP for the State.

Coram : Ranjit More & Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, JJ.

Date : December 1, 2016.

P. C. :

1.

Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submitted that main relief claimed in the writ petition is direction to the Respondents to register an FIR. He submitted that during the pendency of this writ petition, on the basis of Petitioner's complaint, FIR is registered by the concerned Police Station and therefore present writ petition is rendered infructuous. In the light of statement, writ petition is dismissed having rendered infructuous.

[Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.] patilsr 1 / 1