Mohammad Yusuf Sayyed @ Appu v. The State Of Maharashtra

Yadav V.G. 1 20.ba.1320.16.odt.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1320 OF 2016 Mohammad Yusuf Sayyed @ Appu .... Applicant/Accused

Versus

State of Maharashtra .... Respondent through Police Station, Pant Nagar, Mumbai.

Mr. Niranjan Mundargi i/by. Mr. Vikram R. Sutaria for Applicant/Accused.

Mr. Ajay Patil, APP for Respondent/State.

CORAM

:

SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.

DATE :

13TH JANUARY, 2017.

P.C.

.

The learned APP has submitted that in Special Case No. 15 of 2012, 11 witnesses are examined. The applicant is being tried under the provisions of MCOCA. In view of this, it would not be appropriate to consider the application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in the midst of the trial.

2.

Application stands disposed of.

3.

The learned Special Court is hereby requested not to grant unwarranted adjournments to the prosecution or to the defence in the midst of the trial.

(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.)