Shanta Vishwanath Patil v. Bidesh Ramchandra Kulkarni

Muj

5. wp-3019-1998.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3019 OF 1998 Shanta Vishwanath Patil

...Petitioner

Versus

Bidesh Ramchandra Kulkarni

...Respondent

None for the Petitioner.

Mr. S.D. Dharmadhikari for the Respondent.

CORAM:

G.S. KULKARNI, J.

DATED:

10th August, 2017 PC:- 1.

Even on the earlier occasion the petitioner was not represented, the Court was therefore required to pass following order on 20/07/2017.

"1. Mr. Dharmadhikari appears and states that, he was representing the respondents. The cause title of this petition indicates that, as the respondent has expired by an amendment, the Administrator General, Bombay High Court has been impleaded as the respondent. Issue notice to the Administrator General returnable on 07/08/2017. The name of the petitioner and the advocate is correctly indicated on the cause list.

2. However, as a last chance, stand over to 07/08/2017. If on the adjourned date of hearing petitioners are not represented, the Court shall proceed to pass appropriate

Muj

5. wp-3019-1998.doc orders including the orders dismissing the petition for nonprosecution." 2.

Today also none appears for the petitioner. It appears that, the legal heirs of the petitioner i.e. Shanta Vishwanath Patil are not interested to prosecute this petition. Accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.

(G.S. Kulkarni, J.)