Sharda Ratnam v. Pagarav Chaitanyakumar Patel And ANR

(30)APLNo.6582017.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.658 OF 2017 Sharda Ratnam ...

Applicant

Versus

Pagarav Chaitanyakumar Patel & Anr. ...

Respondents .....

None for the Applicant.

Mr.S.V.Gavand, the Additional Public Prosecutor for the Respondent/State.

....

CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.

DATED : 7 th JANUARY 2020.

P.C. :

None for the applicant.

It is seen that even on earlier occasions, the learned Counsel for the applicant was not present. The application was dismissed for want of prosecution. Thereafter, it was again restored by Order dated 28th June 2018.

However, thereafter also the learned Counsel for the petitioner is not present. It appears that the learned Counsel for the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the instant application.

Gaikwad RD 1/2

(30)APLNo.6582017.doc The application is, therefore, again rejected for want of prosecution.

(A.M.BADAR, J.) Gaikwad RD 2/2