Popat Tukaram Mote v. The Deputy Secretary And Director Government Transport Service And ANR

25. IA 18791-22.doc Diksha Rane

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 18791 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION ST.NO. 8275 OF 2019 Digitally signed by DIKSHA DINESH RANE Date:

2022.10.10 18:55:52 +0530 DIKSHA DINESH RANE POPAT TUKARAM MOTE ..APPLICANT VS.

THE DEPUTY SECRETARY AND DIRECTOR GOVT. TRANSPORT SERVICE & ANR.

..RESPONDENTS ------------ Ms. Fauzia T. Bukhari for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. S. D. Rayrikar, AGP for the respondents/State. ------------ CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.

DATE : OCTOBER 4, 2022.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

2.

Learned AGP for the respondents opposed the application praying for restoration of the writ petition. 3.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the application is allowed. The order dated 24/9/2021 passed by the Registrar (Judicial-I) refusing registration of the writ petition for the failure on the part of the petitioner in removing the office objections is set aside. Objections to be removed within eight (8) weeks.

4.

The application is disposed of.

WRIT PETITION ST.NO. 8275 OF 2019 5.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGP for the respondents.

25. IA 18791-22.doc 6.

The order under challenge is passed by the Judge, 8th Labour Court, Mumbai, on 23/3/2018. The application made by the petitioner for difference in the overtime wages, which the petitioner contended that he is entitled to, was rejected by the Labour Court.

7.

Arguable questions are raised. Hence rule. Rule is made returnable after twelve (12) weeks. Learned AGP waives service of rule on behalf of the respondents. (M.S.KARNIK, J.)