Bharat Madhavrao Budukh v. Dinkar Sadashiv Patil

Tapadia RR/B.70 1/2 CAS/1043/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1043 OF 2014 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.18499 OF 2012 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders.

None for Applicant.

Mr.Ashok Bharat Tajane, Advocate for respondent no.1.

CORAM: R.G.KETKAR, J.

DATE : 17/04/2015 PC:

1.

Heard Mr. Ashok Tajane, learned counsel for respondent no.1. None appears for respondent no.1.

2.

This is an application for condonation of delay of 86 days in filing Second Appeal.

3.

Mr. Tajane submitted that no sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. He invited my attention to paragraph 2 of the application.

4.

Having regard to the fact that the delay is of 86 days, in the interest of justice the Application deserves to be

2/2 CAS/1043/2014 allowed so as to decide Appeal on merits, rather than dismissing it on technical ground. Hence, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) with no order as to costs. Office is directed to register Appeal, if it is otherwise ready.

(R.G.KETKAR, J.)