Farzana Sayyed Ahmed Ali v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

Rane * 1/2 * WP-2515-2017 (SR.23) Monday, 29.1.2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2515 OF 2017 Farzana Sayyed Ahmed Ali ....Petitioner V/s.

The State of Maharashtra and anr.

....Respondents * * * * * Mr. Ganesh Gole i/by. Ms. Meghna A. Gowalani, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mrs. A.S. Pai, Addl. P.P. for the State.

CORAM :- CORAM :- R.M. SAVANT, & R.M. SAVANT, & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

DATE :- DATE :- 29TH JANUARY, 2018.

29TH JANUARY, 2018.

P.C. :- P.C. :- 1.

1.

We have read the statement of the respondent We have read the statement of the respondent no.2, who is the First Informant i.e. the Women Police no.2, who is the First Informant i.e. the Women Police Constable. Having regard to the said statement, it cannot Constable. Having regard to the said statement, it cannot be said that the petitioner has been wrongly arraigned as be said that the petitioner has been wrongly arraigned as an accused for the offences punishable under Sections an accused for the offences punishable under Sections

Rane * 2/2 * WP-2515-2017 (SR.23) Monday, 29.1.2018 353, 332, 427, 506, 504 read with Section 34 of the 353, 332, 427, 506, 504 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. In view thereof, no case is made out Indian Penal Code. In view thereof, no case is made out for grant of the relief sought by way of the above writ for grant of the relief sought by way of the above writ petition. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. The petition. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. The observations made in the instant order are tentative and observations made in the instant order are tentative and would not prejudice the petitioners in the trial. would not prejudice the petitioners in the trial. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (R.M. SAVANT, J) (R.M. SAVANT, J)