Arun Appasaheb Hatti v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

906 wp 2516.17.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2516 OF 2017 Mr. Arun Appasheb Hatti ..Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra and anr.

..Respondents Mr. Prajot H. Jaggi, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A. R. Kapadnis, APP for the State.

CORAM : RANJIT MORE & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKARJOSHI, J J.

DATE : 14th NOVEMBER, 2017.

P. C. :

Mr. Kapadnis, learned APP, on instructions, made a statement that pursuant to the petitioner's report, FIR bearing CR No.536 of 2017 is registered against the Directors of Waterfront Construction Pvt.Ltd. for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 on 9th November, 2017. In support of his statement, he has placed on record a report dated 14th November, 2017 of the API-Chaturshringhi Police Station, Pune City. A copy of the said FIR is annexed to the report. 2.

In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly conceded that the grievance of the petitioner raised in the petition no more survived. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed off. [DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.] Shubhada S Kadam 1/1