The State Of Maharashtra v. Shaikh Jakir Shaikh Munaf

ssm 1 8-appln340.17.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 340 OF 2017 The State of Maharashtra .....Applicant Vs.

Shaikh Jakir Shaikh Munaf ....Respondent.

Mr. Ajay Patil, APP for the Applicant-State.

Mr. Chetan S. Damre for the Respondent.

CORAM : A. S. OKA, AND A. S. GADKARI, JJ.

DATE : 7th MARCH, 2019.

P.C.:- Heard the learned APP for the Applicant-State. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent has opposed the prayer for condonation of delay.

In view of the averments made in the Application and in particular paragraph Nos. 2 and 3, a sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay.

Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b). (A.S. GADKARI, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.) 1/1