M/S Suraksha Realty Limited v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

APPLN 887-19.doc Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 887 OF 2019 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1273 OF 2019 M/s. Suraksha Realty Limited .Intervenor

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Subramanyam Mannuru & anr.

.Applicants Vs.

The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr. Niranjan Mundargi i/b. Mr. Rishikesh A. Mohite, Advocate, for the Applicants Mr. S. S. Hulke, APP, for the Respondent - State Mr. Sanjay Udeshi a/w Mr. D. Asha i/b. Sanjay Udeshi & Co., Advocate, for the Intervenor

CORAM

:

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATE :

08.08.2019 P.C.

.

Learned Counsel for the Applicants in Criminal Anticipatory Bail Application No.1273 of 2019, has no objection, if the Intervention Application is allowed and the intervener is impleaded as party Respondent No.2 in Criminal Anticipatory Bail Application No.1273 of 2019.

APPLN 887-19.doc 2.

Learned Counsel for the Applicants in Criminal Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1273 of 2019, to implead the intervener, as party Respondent No. 2 in Criminal Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1273 of 2019. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. Mr. Udeshi, Advocate waives notice on behalf of newly added Respondent No.2.

3.

The Intervention Application is accordingly allowed and disposed of.

(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)