Maniklal Phutarmal Baldota v. Kamlesh Lamba And ORS,.

SIDDHARAM MASHAL Date: 2022.04.01 11:40:10 +0530 IRESH SIDDHARAM MASHAL 8.6720.08 wp.doc ISM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 6720 OF 2008 MANIKLAL PHUTARMAL BALDOTA ....PETITIONER V/s.

KAMLESH LAMBA AND ORS .....RESPONDENTS None for the Petitioner CORAM :

NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE:

MARCH 31, 2022.

P.C.:

1) None appears for the Petitioner. Order impugned in the petition is procedure to be adopted in proving a document on which the Court has given its ruling.

2) I hardly see any convincing reason which warrants interference in the order impugned. No case for interference is made out. 3) Keeping option open to the Petitioner to raise the said issue in Appeal, if so required to be filed against the Decree adverse to his interest, Petition stands dismissed.

[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.] 1/1