Sabeeh Mohammed Umar Bhajikhara Through Its Constituted Attorney Mohammed Aamir Shakeel Ahmed Shaik v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2024:BHC-AS:1232 903-REVN-390-2016.doc Harish

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.390 OF 2016 Sabeeh Mohammed Umar Bhajikhara Through Its Constituted Attorney Mohammed Aamir Shakeel Ahmed Shaik ...Applicant

Versus

The State Of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3224 OF 2022 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.390 OF 2016 Salmabanu Haji Ibrahim Bhajikhara ...Applicant

Versus

Sabeeh Mohammed Umar Bhajikhara Through Its Constituted Attorney Amir Shaikh Mohd. Hussain

...Respondent

-------------------- Adv. R. P. Shirole i/b Mr. R. J. Rathod for the Applicant. Adv. Asmita Jaiswal for Respondent No. 2.

Ms. M. R. Tidke, APP, for the Respondent/State. --------------------- CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE : JANUARY 10, 2024 P. C. :

1.

Learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that the matter

903-REVN-390-2016.doc has been amicably settled between the parties and tenders the copy of the Consent Terms which are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The Consent Terms are signed by the constituted attorney holder of the Appellant and by the Respondent No. 2. Both parties are present before this Court and reiterate the contents of the Consent Terms. The parties are identified by their respective Advocates. The statement made in the Consent Terms are accepted as an undertaking given to this Court.

2.

The Revision Application stands disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms.

3.

Interim Application does not survive for consideration and the same is disposed of.

(SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. )