Sanjay Radhesham Oza v. Ichalkaranji Municipal Council Through Its Chief Office, Ichalkaranji And ORS.
TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Trupti 1 9-ia-3339-2021.doc TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Date: 2022.10.21 18:08:57 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3339 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3021 OF 2014 Sanjay Radhesham Oza ...
Applicant
Versus
Ichalkaranji Municipal Council, Ichalkaranji & Ors.
...
Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3470 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3022 OF 2014 Shri. Rajendra Mahadeo Dangare ...
Applicant
Versus
Ichalkaranji Municipal Council, Ichalkaranji & Ors.
...
Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3478 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2987 OF 2014 Shri. Gajanan Haridas Ghatte ...
Applicant
Versus
Ichalkaranji Municipal Council, Ichalkaranji & Ors.
...
Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 19181 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2989 OF 2014 Shamsundar Bansilal Marda ...
Applicant
Versus
Ichalkaranji Municipal Council, Ichalkaranji & Ors.
...
Respondents
Trupti 2 9-ia-3339-2021.doc WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 19171 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2988 OF 2014 Shri. Bankatlal Laxminarayan Loya (Baheti) Since deceased through LRs ...
Applicant
Versus
Ichalkaranji Municipal Council, Ichalkaranji & Ors.
...
Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3337 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3428 OF 2014 Sou. Rajashree Sharad Dayma ...
Applicant
Versus
Ichalkaranji Municipal Council, Ichalkaranji & Ors.
...
Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 19166 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 222 OF 2015 Shri.Dattatraya Sambhaji Kanoje & Ors.
...
Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
...
Respondents .......
Mr.Ashutosh M. Kulkarni for the Applicants in all Interim Applications.
Mr. Akshay P. Shinde for the Respondent No.1- Municipal Council. Mr. B.V.Samant, AGP for the State.
......
Trupti 3 9-ia-3339-2021.doc CORAM :
NITIN JAMDAR AND SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE :
18 OCTOBER 2022 P.C. :
The learned Counsel for the Applicants tenders an unconditional apology for not remaining present when the petitions were dismissed for non-prosecution and states that when they are listed on the next date, the petitions would be attended. 2.
In light of this apology so tendered, the interim applications are allowed. The writ petitions are restored. The writ petitions to be listed as per date assigned.
3.
The interim applications are accordingly disposed of. (SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)