Subhangi Santosh Patil And ORS. v. Union Of India And ORS.

2.CAO.197-18.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 197 OF 2018 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 17710 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1043 OF 2018 Shubhangi Santosh Patil and others ..Applicants

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Shubhangi Santosh Patil and others.

..Petitioners

Versus

Union of India and others ..Respondents ....

Mr. Nitin Mulye, Advocate for the Applicants. None for the Respondents.

....

CORAM : R.M. SAVANT & R. G. KETKAR, JJ.

DATE : 19th JULY, 2018 P.C.

1.

Heard Mr. Nitin Mulye, learned Counsel for the applicants. 2.

Mr. Mulye submits that he has served this application as also Review Petition on the other side. Despite service, none appears on behalf of the respondents.

3.

For the reasons stated in the application, we are satisfied that the applicants have made out a sufficient cause for condoning the delay of 107 days caused in filing Review Petition. Hence, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A) with no order as to costs. Order accordingly. [R. G. KETKAR, J.] [R.M. SAVANT, J.] Deshmane (PS) by Pradipkumar Prakashrao Deshmane Date:

2018.07.21 09:56:27 +0530 1 / 1 Pradipkumar Prakashrao Deshmane