← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/249/2016allowed to be withdrawn

Chandrashekhar S/O Tukarampant Madankar v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Principal Secretary(Dept. Of Energy) And ORS

2016-10-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anoop V. Mohta6 pages

Rng 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.249 OF 2016 Chandrashekhar Tukarampant Madankar .. Petitioner vs State of Maharashtra & ors .. Respondents with CONTEMPT PETITION (L) No.18619 of 2016 Anup Udhav Lokhande .. Petitioner vs State of Maharashtra & ors .. Respondents with O.S.CONTEMPT PETITION (L) No.51 OF 2016 Rohan Vijay Madshingikar .. Petitioner vs State of Maharashtra & ors .. Respondents Mr.S.B.Talekar a/w Mr.Vinod Tayade,Mr.Vinod Sangikar I/b Talekar & Co for Petitioner Mr.A.A.Joshi for Respondent nos.2 to 4.

Mr.V.N.Sagare AGP for State in both matters ...

CORAM: ANOOP V.MOHTA & G.S.KULKARNI, JJ DATE: 24 OCTOBER 2016 ORDER:

Not on Board. Upon mentioning taken on Board. 1.

Heard Mr. Tayade learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Joshi for the respondent-MSETCL. In view of our directions in the judgment in writ petition No.5995 of 2016 along with other connected petitions, as decided today, Mr.Joshi learned counsel for the respondentMSETCL makes a statement that as per directions as contained in the said

Rng 2 judgment, the respondent-MSETCL shall make payment of the amount equivalent to the salary and allowances for the period 13 June 2016 till date. In view of the statement of Mr.Joshi, Mr.Talekar and Mr.Tayade learned counsel for the petitioner seek leave to withdraw the contempt petitions.

2.

Contempt petitions are accordingly allowed to be withdrawn and are disposed of as such. No costs. G.S.KULKARNI, J ANOOP V.MOHTA, J

Rng 3

Rng 4

Rng 5

Rng 6