← Library
Bombay High CourtREVN/394/2016others disposed off

Arvind Rajaram Suryavanshi v. Hemlata Murlidhar Patil And ANR

2016-07-26Hon'Ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 394 OF 2016 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 385 OF 2016 Arvind Rajaram Suryavanshi ...Applicant

Versus

Hemlata Murlidhar Patil & Anr.

...Respondents

Mr. Anil Joshi for the Applicant Mr. Balaji Gorakh Gaikwad for the Respondent No. 1 Ms. R. V. Newton, A.P.P for the Respondent No.2-State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

TUESDAY, 26 th JULY, 2016 P.C. :

1.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and the respondent No.1. Both the Counsel state that the applicant and the respondent No. 1 have settled their dispute amicably and have entered into Consent Terms. The Consent Terms signed by the parties and their respective Advocates are tendered. The same are taken on record and marked `X'. 2.

The parties are present and have been identified by their respective Counsel. The parties have settled their entire dispute for an 1/3

amount of Rs. 5,07,000/-. The applicant has deposited the said amount in this Court on 19th July, 2006 by Demand Draft No. 930108 dated 16th July, 2016.

3.

The applicant has no objection if the respondent No. 1 Hemlata withdraws the amount of Rs. 5,07,000/- which is deposited in the Registry of this Court. Accordingly, respondent No. 1 also has no objection if the impugned judgments and orders are quashed and set-aside and the applicant is acquitted of the offence, with which he is charged. 4.

Accordingly, the revision application is allowed. The impugned judgment and order dated 26th November, 2014 passed by the lower Court and the judgment and order dated 10th June, 2016 passed by the Sessions Court are quashed and set-aside and the applicant is acquitted of the offence with which he is charged. The respondent No. 1-Hemlata is permitted to withdraw the said amount of Rs. 5,07,000/- deposited in the Registry of this Court, after showing proof of her identification. 5.

In view of the aforesaid, the revision application is disposed of. 2/3

6.

In view of the above order, Criminal Application No. 385 of 2016 does not survive. The same is also disposed of. 7.

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

3/3