Mr. Ravindra Hiraji Raut v. Mr. Shrikant Vasudev Joglekar

Digitally signed by VINA ARVIND KHADPE Date:

2022.07.20 17:57:13 +0530 VINA ARVIND KHADPE Vina Khadpe

(7) CAF.4287.;2018.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4287 OF 2018 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.17829 OF 2018 Mr. Ravindra Hiraji Raut ....Applicant / Appellant

Versus

Mr. Shrikant Vasudev Joglekar ....Respondent Mr. Abhishek Patil for the Applicant / Appellant. Ms. Aditi Palnitkar a/w Ms. Nidhi Singh, Ms. Moksha Kothari i/b. Vidhi Partners for the Respondent No.1.

CORAM : SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.

DATE : 19th JULY, 2022.

P.C. :

1.

It is an Application for condonation of delay moved by the Applicant.

2.

Heard Mr.Abhishek Patil, learned counsel for the Applicant and Ms. Aditi Palnitkar i/b. Vidhi Partners for the Respondent. 3.

There seems to be delay of 11 days. Even though learned counsel for the Respondent raised objection, it would be just and proper to condone a small volume of delay in the interest of justice. Hence, I pass the following order;

:: ORDER ::

(i) Application for condonation of delay is hereby allowed in terms of prayer clause 4(a).

1/2

Vina Khadpe

(7) CAF.4287.;2018.doc (ii) Registry is directed to make scrutiny of Appeal as per procedure and thereafter it be numbered and place the matter before the appropriate Court.

(iii) Learned counsel for the Applicant is directed to serve the copy of Appeal memo with annexures on the learned counsel for the Respondent.

(iii) Application for condonation of delay is accordingly disposed of.

(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) 2/2