← Library
Bombay High CourtFA/129/2001disposed off

The State Of Maharashtra v. Punjaram B. Chaudhari And ORS.

2024-03-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain3 pages

TAUSEEF LAIQUEE FAROOQUI IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TAUSEEF LAIQUEE FAROOQUI Date: 2024.03.01 19:00:04 +0530 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.135 OF 2001 The State of Maharashtra ...Appellant

Versus

Smt. Sindhubai V. Choudhari & Ors.

...Respondents

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1946 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.135 OF 2001 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (XOB) (STAMP) NO.10356 OF 2002 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.135 OF 2001 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.130 OF 2001 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (XOB) (STAMP) NO.10351 OF 2002 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.130 OF 2001 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.128 OF 2001 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (XOB) (STAMP) NO.10355 OF 2002 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.128 OF 2001 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.133 OF 2001 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (XOB) (STAMP) NO.10348 OF 2002 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.133 OF 2001

WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.131 OF 2001 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (XOB) (STAMP) NO.10353 OF 2002 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.131 OF 2001 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.132 OF 2001 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (XOB) (STAMP) NO.10354 OF 2002 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.132 OF 2001 WITH FAFIRST APPEAL NO.129 OF 2001 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (XOB) (STAMP) NO.10358 OF 2002 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.129 OF 2001 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.134 OF 2001 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (XOB) (STAMP) NO.10349 OF 2002 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.134 OF 2001 __________ Mr. Suresh Sabrad a/w. Mr. Pratik Sabrad, Mr. Amey Sawant and Ms. Gracy Saldana for the Respondent (Malegaon Municipal Corp.). Mr. A. R. Patil, Addl. G. P. for Appellant (State) in all appeals. Mr. P. N. Joshi for Respondent (in all appeals) and for Applicant in XOB matters (in all appeals).

__________ CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR, JITENDRA JAIN, J.J.

DATE : 1st MARCH 2024.

P.C.

1.

The learned counsel for the parties have tendered minutes of order. As per the learned counsel, since the Acquiring Body had not been impleaded in the reference proceedings, the amount of compensation would have to be re-determined in the light of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad Vs. Gyan Devi (Dead) By L.Rs. & Ors. 2.

We have perused the minutes of the order. In our view, the course proposed serves the interest of justice. The minutes of order are taken on record and marked '

A' for identification.

3.

In view of aforesaid, all the First Appeals as well as CrossObjections are disposed of in terms of the minutes of the order. 4.

In view of disposal of First Appeal No.135 of 2001, Interim Application No.1946 of 2022 does not survive and it is also disposed of. 5.

The decree be drawn accordingly. The parties to act in accordance with the minutes of the order. The record and proceedings shall be send to the Reference Court forthwith. [JITENDRA JAIN, J.] [A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.] 1995 (2) SCC 326