Shri. More Nayankumar Pandurang And ORS. v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary, Rural Development Dept. And ORS.

31-7877-7994.2016.sxw hvn

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7877 OF 2016 Sharad Yashwant Varule and Ors.

... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7994 OF 2016 Shri More Nayankumar Pandurang and anr.

... Petitioners

Versus

State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...Respondents

Mr. S.S. Pakale i/by Mr. S.M. Katkar for the petitioners. Mr. Pankaj Pandey for R. Nos. 2,3 to 5 in WP No.7877 of 2016 and for R. Nos. 2 to 4 in WP No. 7994 of 2016. Mr. Vikas Mali, AGP for R. No. 1.

CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.

DATED : NOVEMBER 18, 2016.

P.C.

Parties through their counsel.

2.

The petitioners are aggrieved by their respective transfer orders. According to them, the transfer order is being passed contrary to the Government Resolution which says that in case of husband and wife being employee of the Zilla Parishad or Government, they shall not be transfered to the place beyond 30

31-7877-7994.2016.sxw Kms as far as possible, as provided in the GR. Learned Counsel for respondent no.2 to 5 submits that before approaching this court, the petitioners had not filed any representation challenging the impugned transfer orders pointing out the violation of GR and the personal difficulties as have been stated in the petition. 3.

Keeping in view the aforesaid, we are inclined to dispose of this petition with a liberty to the petitioners to submit a detailed representation with supporting documents, if not already submitted, before the CEO, i.e. respondent no. 2 within ten days from today. In case such representation is submitted within the aforesaid period, respondent no.2 shall consider the same and shall take appropriate decision on the same by taking into consideration the grounds as may be stated in the representation. Let the said decision be taken within two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. All contentions are kept open. Petitioners shall be at liberty to challenge the decision, if the same is adverse to the interest of the petitioners. 4.

Both the petitions stand disposed of.

5.

Parties to act on authenticated copy of this order. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)