Shri Tukaram Nabaji Kanchan v. Shri Arun Dnyanoba Kanchan And Another

13. CAS 1114.14.doc JPP

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1114 OF 2014 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 477 OF 2014 Mr. Tukaram Nabaji Kanchan.

... Applicant/Appellant.

V/s.

Smt. Tanubai Dnyanoba Kanchan & Ors.

... Respondents.

Mr. Dilip Bodake for the Applicant/Appellant. Mr. V.S. Tadake for Respondents 2 and 3.

CORAM : N.M. Jamdar, J.

15 July, 2016.

P.C. :- Heard learned Counsel for the parties. The learned Counsel for the Applicant, at present, presses two reliefs sought for in the Application i.e. 11a(i) and 11a(ii).

2.

As regard relief 11a(ii), the learned Counsel for the Respondents on instructions makes a statement that the Respondent

13. CAS 1114.14.doc Nos.2 and 3 will not create any third party rights in respect of the property specified in the prayer clause. This statement is accepted. 3.

As regard relief 11a(i) regarding changes in revenue records, it is not necessary to pass any orders, as any change made in the revenue records are always subject to the outcome of the present Second Appeal and the revenue records do not confer any title. 4.

The Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. (N.M. Jamdar, J.)