Dharampal Murlidhar Barmase v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary And ORS

1/2 rpwst-17883-18.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETN. IN WP STAMP NO. 17883 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION 11750 OF 2016 ...

Dharampal Murlidhar Barmase ....Petitioner V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary And Ors.

....Respondents ...

Mr.Yashodeep Deshmukh a/w Ms.Vaidehi P. Deshmukh for the Applicant. Mr.N.C.Walimbe, AGP for the State.

Mr.Shrikrishna Ganbavale for Respondent No.3-MPSC. ...

CORAM : A.A. SAYED & SMT. DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : 15 JANUARY 2019 ( IN CHAMBER AT 5 P.M.) P.C.:

Learned AGP, on instructions from Mr.M.U.Patil, Asst.Section Officer, Agriculture, Dairy Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai, states that no candidate was given more than 40% relaxation. 2.

Learned Counsel for the Respondent No.3-MPSC has pointed out that on the same date as the impugned order i.e. 27 September 2017, the Writ Petition No.9390 of 2015 filed by MPSC was also allowed, wherein the Petitioner was a party, however, that order has not been challenged. Uday.P.Kambli 1/2

2/2 rpwst-17883-18.doc 2.

We find no error apparent in the order under review. Even otherwise, no case for review is made out. The Review Petition is dismissed.

(SMT. DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI,,J.) (A.A.SAYED, J.) Uday.P.Kambli 2/2