Satish Dada Londhe v. The State Of Maharashtra

1. cri appa 814-15.doc RMA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 814 OF 2015 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 892 OF 2015 Satish Dada Londhe ..

Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ..

Respondent ...................

Appearances Ms. Rohini M. Dandekar Advocate (appointed) for the Applicant Mrs. M.H. Mhatre APP for the State ...................

CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : JULY 23, 2015.

P.C.:

1.

The applicant has preferred this application through jail. In this application, the applicant has requested that instead of already appointed Advocate, another Advocate from Legal Aid Panel be appointed to represent him. The applicant has suggested few names of the Advocates, one of them is Advocate Ms. Nasreen Ayubi.

jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2

1. cri appa 814-15.doc 2.

In view of the above, we cancel the appointment of Advocate Ms. Rohini Dandekar and instead, appoint Advocate Ms. Nasreen Ayubi who is on the panel of Advocates of High Court Legal Services Committee, Bombay to represent the Appellant.

3.

The application is allowed in above terms.

[ DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J ] [SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J] jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 2