Bombay High CourtCP/506/2014disposed off

Madhavi K. Rai And ANR v. Smt. Urmila Pardhe, Education Officer (Sec.) And ANR

2017-10-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shantanu S. Kemkar1 pages

hvn 10-cp-506.2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 506 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2919 OF 2012 Madhavi K. Rai & Anr.

... Petitioners

Versus

Smt. .Urmila Pardhe and Ors.

... Respondents Mr. Yatin Malvankar i/by Mr. Mayuresh Lagu for the petitioners. Mr. A.I. Patel, AGP for respondent no.2 State. CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & G.S.KULKARNI, JJ.

OCTOBOER 11, 2017 P.C.:

We have been appraised by the learned counsel for the petitioners that fresh order has already been passed. According to him, before passing the order opportunity of hearing has not been given. Be that as it may, in our considered view, since the fresh order has already been passed.

The petitioner can challenge the same before the appropriate forum. With the liberty to challenge the said order, we dispose of the contempt petition.

(G.S. KULKARNI, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)