Narhari Narayan Satam @ Pankaj v. The State Of Maharashtra

1 / 2 07-APEAL-ST-11548-22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO.11548 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2319 OF 2022 Narhari Narayan Satam @ Pankaj .... Appellant/ Applicant versus State of Maharashtra .... Respondent .......

• Mr. Jagdish G. Shetty, Advocate for Appellant/Applicant. • Mrs. Veera Shinde, APP for the State/Respondent.

CORAM

: M. G. SEWLIKAR, J.

DATE : 20th JULY, 2022 P.C. :

1.

Heard.

2.

There is delay of 7 days in preferring the Appeal. In paragraph No.5 of the application, the Applicant has explained the reasons for not preferring the Appeal within the prescribed period of limitation.

Digitally signed by MANUSHREE V NESARIKAR Date:

2022.07.20 16:19:06 +0530 MANUSHREE V NESARIKAR 3.

Learned APP strongly objected for condonation of delay. It is alleged in paragraph No.5 of the application that the Nesarikar

2 / 2 07-APEAL-ST-11548-22.odt Applicant was facing financial difficulty on account of the death of his parents.

4.

Having regard to this, I am inclined to condone the delay. The delay is therefore condoned. Appeal be registered if it is otherwise fit for registration.

5.

Interim application disposed of.

(M. G. SEWLIKAR, J.)