Shri. Guruddin Sitaram Yadav Decd Thru Lhrs v. Shri. Karanraj Bhurmal And ANR

26.IA.13465.2023.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.13465 OF 2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2230 OF 2003 Shri. Guruddin Sitaram Yadav Decd Thru Lhrs ...Applicant V/s.

Shri. Karanraj bhurmal and Anr

...Respondents

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) N.24565 OF 2023 IN INTERIM APPLICATION NO.13465 OF 2023 Dharod Apartment Co-Op. Hsg. Society Ltd.

...Applicant V/s.

Shri. Guruddin Sitaram Yadav Decd Thru Lhrs

...Respondent

____________________________________ Mr. Pramod Pawar for the Applicant.

Mr. Rajesh Datar for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Amol Diliprao Nawale by Amol Diliprao Nawale Date:

2023.09.17 18:14:14 +0530 ___________________________________

CORAM

: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATED : 12th SEPTEMBER, 2023 P.C.:

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.13465 OF 2023 1.

This Application is filed to bring on record the proposed legal heirs of the sole Petitioner. There is no delay in filing this Application. Mr. Rajesh Datar, the learned advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 states that he has no objection if the Application is allowed. 2.

I have gone through the contents of the application and I am satisfied that the appellant has made out a case to condone the Amol D. Nawale

26.IA.13465.2023.doc delay. Hence, Interim Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b).

3.

Amendment to be carried out within a period of four weeks from today.

4.

The Interim Application is accordingly disposed of. INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO.24565 OF 2023 1.

This Application is filed by the Applicant-Cooperative Housing Society. It is a claim of the housing society that pursuant to a registered deed of conveyance dated 27th January, 2021, they have purchased the subject property from the original landlord, who was respondent in the present Writ Petition.

2.

Therefore, this application is filed to substitute the name of the Applicant society in place and instead of original respondents in the Writ Petition. Mr. Rajesh Datar, the learned advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 states that he has no objection if the Application is allowed.

3.

In view of the same, I have gone through the contents of the application and I am satisfied. Hence, Interim Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b).

4.

Amendment to be carried out within a period of four weeks from today.

5.

The interim application is accordingly disposed of. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Amol D. Nawale