Satyaprakash Bhojraj Verma v. The State Of Maharashtra

Megha 24_ia_2053_2021 in apeal_365_2011.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION by MEGHA S PARAB Date:

2021.10.27 13:59:27 +0530 INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2053 OF 2021 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.365 OF 2011 MEGHA S PARAB Satyaprakash Bhojraj Verma (since deceased through his heirs and legal representatives

1) Anita Satyaprakash Verma and Ors.

...Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

....

Mr. Bhavesh Mogam i/b. Mr. Suresh Kamble for the Applicants. Mr. P.H. Gaikwad, APP for Respondent -State.

Mr. Kuldeep Patil, CBI for Respondent No.1-A. CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.

DATED: 25th OCTOBER, 2021.

P.C.:- The original Appellant has expired. The Applicants, who are the legal representatives of the Appellant have sought leave to proceed with the appeal.

2.

Mr. Kuldeep Patil, learned counsel for Respondent No.1-ACBI does not oppose the application. Hence, leave is granted to bring the legal representatives of the Appellant on record. Cause title be amended accordingly.

1/2

Megha 24_ia_2053_2021 in apeal_365_2011.doc 3.

It is seen that the State of Maharashtra as well as CBI is shown as Respondent No.1. Learned counsel for the Applicant seeks leave to amend the cause title by showing State of Maharashtra as Respondent No.1 and CBI as Respondent No.1-A. Leave is granted. Amendments to be carried out within a period of two weeks. 4.

The application stands disposed of.

(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) 2/2