← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/78/2016disposed off

Shri. Sanjeev Kashinath Mhatre v. Shri. Anant Gajanan Patil

2017-11-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.J. Kathawalla2 pages

kpd 1 / 2 920-WP-6836-2015.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6836 OF 2015 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 78 OF 2016 Anant Gajanan Patil ... Petitioner

Versus

Gramin Vidya Vikas Vardhini Mandal and others ... Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 78 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6836 OF 2015 Shri. Sanjay Kashinath Mhatre ... Applicant In the matter between :

Anant Gajanan Patil ... Petitioner

Versus

Gramin Vidya Vikas Vardhini Mandal and others ... Respondents Ms. Anupama Shah for the Petitioner.

Mr. N.

V. Bandiwadekar instructed by Mr. Sagar Mane for the Applicant/Intervenor/Proposed Respondent No.5. Mr. G.J. Sabnis for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Ms. Vaishali Nimbalkar alongwith Mr.K.R. Kulkarni for the Respondent Nos.3 and 4. CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.

DATED : 22 nd NOVEMBER, 2017 P.C.:

1.

The above Civil Application No.78 of 2016 is filed by the Applicant Sanjay Kashinath Mhatre for being impleaded as Respondent No.5 to the aforesaid Writ Petition. The Learned Advocate appearing for the Management states that the

kpd 2 / 2 920-WP-6836-2015.sxw Petitioner has admittedly attained superannuation on 31 st August, 2016 and thereafter, the Respondent No.5 was appointed as Head Mistress from 1 st October, 2016 ; in view thereof the orders passed in the above Writ Petition will not affect the position of proposed Respondent No.5 as Head Master ; therefore, the question of Applicant being joined as proposed party Respondent to the above Writ Petition does not arise. The Learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner also echoes the view of the Learned Advocate appearing for the Management. In view thereof, no orders are passed on the above Civil Application and the same is accordingly disposed off. 2.

Stand over to 11 th December, 2017.

( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )