Jagdish Daulat Mahale v. The State Of Maharashtra

1. cri wp 2404-16.doc RMA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2404 OF 2016 Jagdish Daulat Mahale ..

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ..

Respondent ...................

Appearances Mr. Hitesh P. Shah Advocate for the Petitioner Mrs. U.V. Kejriwal APP for the State ...................

CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.

DATE : JULY 26, 2016.

ORAL ORDER [PER SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] :

1.

Heard both sides.

2.

Rule. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith. 3.

The petitioner is seeking premature release. It is stated that the petitioner has undergone the period of imprisonment and he has been released from prison. In this view of the matter, this petition has become infructuous, jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2

1. cri wp 2404-16.doc hence, rule is discharged.

[ MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ] jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 2