Balkrishna Shetkar v. The State Of Maharashtra

90.5_apl_701_2015.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.701 OF 2015 Balkrishna Shetkar ...Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

------ Mr. Ninad Muzumdar for the Applicant.

Mr. V.B.K. Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent-State. CORAM:-M.L. TAHALIYANI, J.

DATED :24th JULY, 2015.

P.C.

Admit. Heard finally.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent -State.

3.

Perused the impugn order. In my opinion, learned Magistrate is unnecessarily wasting valuable time of the Court. It is better that he concentrates on the substantive work instead of indulging into frivolous production of documents. 4.

Warrant issued against the Applicant shall stand cancelled. He shall appear before the Court on next date of hearing. megha Page No.1 of 2

90.5_apl_701_2015.doc 5.

The application stands disposed of.

(JUDGE) megha Page No.2 of 2