← Library
Bombay High CourtBA/1414/2016others disposed off

Manik Appaso Lad v. The State Of Maharashtra

2016-11-22Hon'Ble Smt. Justice S.S. Jadhav2 pages

1 9.1414.16 ba

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1414 OF 2016 Manik Appaso Lad .....Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 646 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1414 OF 2016 Sandip Baban Jadhav ....Intervener

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Manik Appaso Lad .....Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent Mr. Umesh R. Mankapure Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Sachin Deokar i/b Mr. V. V. Purwant Advocate for intervener Mr. Vinod Chate APP for the State.

Mr. S. L. Kokitkar, H.C. Paluj Police Station, Sangli. CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.

DATED : 22nd NOVEMBER, 2016.

ism

2 9.1414.16 ba PC :

1) This is a third bail application filed by accused Manik Lad. First bail application no. 1382 of 2014 was rejected on 05/08/2014. Subsequently bail application no. 1565 of 2015 was filed. The said application was withdrawn with liberty to the applicant to file fresh application in case trial does not commence within 6 months.

2) It appears that witness summons have been issued. The learned Sessions Judge shall expedite the trial as far as possible and complete the recording of evidence as far as possible within 10 months from the date of framing of charge.

3) In view of the above circumstance, bail application stands disposed of. 4) Since the bail application is disposed of, nothing survives in intervention application and is disposed of accordingly. (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.) ism