← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/17668/2022allowed

Dr. Nadir Eddie Bharucha v. Mrs. Tina Amin (Being The Heir And Legal Representative Of The Deceased Nayan M. Amin)

2024-03-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil2 pages

37.ia.13550.2023.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 13550 OF 2023 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.481 OF 2015 Dr. Nadir Eddie Bharucha And Ors.

...Applicants

Versus

Mrs. Tina Amin (being The Heir And Legal Representative Of The Deceased Nayan M. Amin)

...Respondent

____________________________________ Adv. Krupa Joshi i/b. FZB Associates for the applicant. ____________________________________

CORAM

: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATED : 8 MARCH 2024 P.C.:

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 13550 OF 2023 1.

This Interim Application is filed for amending cause title of the Civil Revision Application by adding the name of Mrs. Perin Dubash as an applicant, being Trustee of the R. D. Sethna Scholarship fund. Ms.Joshi submits that they are already served copy of the Interim Application on the respondent. She submits that an affidavit of service to that effect has already filed in the registry.

2.

When the matter was called out, none appears for the Respondent.

3.

Heard. I have gone through the contents of the application. I am satisfied Amol D. Nawale

37.ia.13550.2023.doc that the Applicant has made out a case to allow this Application. Hence, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a). 4.

Amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today.

5.

Interim Application is disposed of accordingly. INTERIM APPLICATION NO.17668 OF 2022 2.

This Interim Application is filed to delete the name of original applicant No.3 who was the trustee of the same R. D. Sethna Scholarship Fund. Since the original applicant No.3 has died and he was trustee of R. D. Sethna Scholarship Fund, the applicant desires to delete his name. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that they already served a copy of the Interim Application on the other side and affidavit of service to that effect has already filed in the registry.

3.

When the matter was called out, none appears for the Respondent.

4.

Heard. I have gone through the contents of the application. I am satisfied that the Applicant has made out a case to allow this Application. Hence, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a).

5.

Amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today.

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Amol D. Nawale