Shri. Haribhau Janu Jiman (Chavan) Through Poa v. The District Resettlement Office (Dro) And ORS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.12386 OF 2017 Mahadeo Janu Jiman (Chavan)
...Petitioner
Versus
The District Resettlement Office (DRO) & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.31 OF 2018 Dhondiba Laxman Sakpal (Ahire)
...Petitioner
Versus
The District Resettlement Office (DRO) & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.43 OF 2018 Ramchandra Narayan Sakpal (Ahire)
...Petitioner
Versus
The District Resettlement Office (DRO) & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.44 OF 2018 Sanjay Ranu Jiman (Chavan)
...Petitioner
Versus
The District Resettlement Office (DRO) & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.45 OF 2018 Laxman Bhiva Jiman (Chavan)
...Petitioner
Versus
The District Resettlement Office (DRO) & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.47 OF 2018 Haribhau Janu Jiman (Chavan)
...Petitioner
Versus
The District Resettlement Office (DRO) & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.48 OF 2018 Ramchandra Kashinath Sakpal (Ahire)
...Petitioner
Versus
1/3
The District Resettlement Office (DRO) & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.49 OF 2018 Kisan Hari Jiman (Chavan)
...Petitioner
Versus
The District Resettlement Office (DRO) & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.50 OF 2018 Ashok Maruti Sawant
...Petitioner
Versus
The District Resettlement Office (DRO) & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.51 OF 2018 Kisan Hariba Bhosale (Agunde)
...Petitioner
Versus
The District Resettlement Office (DRO) & Ors.
...Respondents
.....
Mr. Dhananjay K. Chavan i/b. Mr. C.A. Choudhari for the Petitioner. Mr. P.G. Sawant, AGP for the Respondents-State. CORAM : RANJIT MORE AND SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED: 17th JANUARY, 2018.
P.C.:- The Petitioners counsel placing reliance on the order dated 19th December, 2016 passed by this Bench in Writ Petition No.3780 of 2016 contends that all these matters pertain to the projects i.e. Dhom Dam Irrigation Project, Koyana Dam Project and each of the Petitioners in the above Petitions who are entitled for such allotment only if they comply with the necessary conditions and are entitled. It is needless to say that the consideration of the applications or representations 2/3
concerned, has to be strictly in accordance with the procedure contemplated, keeping in mind the fact that since 1970 the Petitioner is deprived of benefits of the land belonging to him since they were acquired. He is not put in possession of the alternate land till date. 2.
We accordingly dispose of the Writ Petitions by directing the Respondents to treat the legal notice dated 17/4/2017 and also the present petitions itself as representations and dispose them of strictly in accordance with law, based on merits, as expeditiously as possible, in any case not later than four months from today. (SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.) 3/3