← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/468/2022disposed off

Rahul Baburao Navsagare v. Shravan Hardikar, Inspector Genreal Of Registrationand Collector Of Stamps And ANR.

2023-03-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice G.S. Patel,Hon'Ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar Gokhale3 pages

Digitally signed by SHAMBHAVI NILESH SHIVGAN Date:

2023.03.21 18:25:19 +0530 SHAMBHAVI NILESH SHIVGAN Shivgan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.672 OF 2022 Yojana Vipul Bari

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra Through the Additional Chief Secretary Revenue Department & Ors

...Respondents

WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.467 OF 2022 Manish Pawar

...Petitioner

Versus

Shravan Hardikar, Inspector General of Registration and Collector of Stamps & Anr

...Respondents

WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.468 OF 2022 Rahul Baburao Navsagare

...Petitioner

Versus

Shravan Hardikar, Inspector General of Registration and Collector of Stamps & Anr

...Respondents

Mr Dilip Shinde, for the Petitioner in CP 672/2022. Mr Dilip Shinde, i/b Sandeep Dere for the Petitioner in CPs 467 & 468/2022.

Mr PP Kakade,GP, with SB Kalel, AGP, for the Respondent-State in CPs 467 and 468/2022.

Mr SR Nargolkar,with Arjun Kadam for Respondent No.2. Mr Abhinav A Bhatkar, i/b Ajay S Patil, for Respondent No.14.

CORAM

G.S. Patel & Neela Gokhale, JJ.

DATED:

PC:- 1.

On 9th February 2023, we noted Mr Nargolkar's statement that special arrangements had been made on 16th, 17th and 18th February 2023 by the offices of the Sub-Registrar, Kalyan-5 and Ulhasnagar-3 to accept documents from the Contempt Petitioners for registration. These dates were specifically earmarked for the executants, who are Contempt Petitioners. We appreciated the efforts.

2.

We also said that if the executants missed this special opportunity window, it would not be made available again. Mr Nargolkar reports that hardly seven or eight people came, and that too with incomplete documents which could not possibly be registered.

3.

Today, applications for adjournment are made on behalf of the Petitioners. We have no desire to spend time, especially when our list is this crowded, by indulging Contempt Petitioners like this.

4.

Nothing remains in the Contempt Petitions. These are disposed of. There will be no order as to costs. ( Neela Gokhale, J) (G. S. Patel, J)