Shri. Ananda Dagadu Kadam, Through P.A.Holder Shri.Vijay Laxman Bhosale v. The District Resettlement Office (Dro) And ORS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.55 OF 2018 Janu Nana Kokare (Dhangar)
...Petitioner
Versus
The District Resettlement Office (DRO) & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.56 OF 2018 Bhiku Shankar Dhanawade
...Petitioner
Versus
The District Resettlement Office (DRO) & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.57 OF 2018 Ananda Dagadu Kadam
...Petitioner
Versus
The District Resettlement Office (DRO) & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.58 OF 2018 Ankush Dhondiba Kokare (Dhangar)
...Petitioner
Versus
The District Resettlement Office (DRO) & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.59 OF 2018 Sitaram Ramji Shinde
...Petitioner
Versus
The District Resettlement Office (DRO) & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.64 OF 2018 Kondiba Rakhmaji Gaikwad (Mahar)
...Petitioner
Versus
The District Resettlement Office (DRO) & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.80 OF 2018 Pandurang Baburao Kokare (Dhangar)
...Petitioner
1/3
Versus
The District Resettlement Office (DRO) & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.81 OF 2018 Pandurang Waghu Kokare (Dhangar)
...Petitioner
Versus
The District Resettlement Office (DRO) & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.12406 OF 2017 Ananda Ramji Sapkal
...Petitioner
Versus
The District Resettlement Office (DRO) & Ors.
...Respondents
.....
Mr. Dhananjay K. Chavan i/b. Mr. R.A. Choudhari for the Petitioner. Mr. P.G. Sawant, AGP for the Respondents-State. CORAM : RANJIT MORE AND SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED: 17th JANUARY, 2018.
P.C.:- The Petitioner's counsel placing reliance on the order dated 19th December, 2016 passed by this Bench in Writ Petition No.3780 of 2016 would contend that all these matters pertain to the projects i.e. Dhom Dam Irrigation Project, Koyana Dam Project and each of the Petitioners in the above Petitions who are entitled for such allotment only if they comply with the necessary conditions and are entitled. It is needless to say that the consideration of the applications or representations concerned, has to be strictly in accordance with the 2/3
procedure contemplated, keeping in mind the fact that since 1970 the Petitioner is deprived of benefits of the land belonging to him since they were acquired. He is not put in possession of the alternate land till date.
2.
We accordingly dispose of the Writ Petition by directing the Respondents to treat the legal notice dated 4/7/2017 and also the present petition itself as representation and dispose them of strictly in accordance with law, based on merits, as expeditiously as possible, in any case not later than four months from today. (SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.) 3/3