Krishna Anna Nalawade And ANR. v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

22. CRI WP 3292-19.doc R.M. AMBERKAR (Private Secretary)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3292 OF 2019 Krishna Anna Nalawade & Anr.

..

Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

..

Respondents ...................

 Mr. Aditya Jadhav for the Petitioners  Mrs. S.D. Shinde, APP for the State  Ms. Dhanashree Lad for Respondent No. 2 ...................

CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & N.R. BORKAR, JJ.

DATE : JANUARY 7, 2020.

P.C.:

1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for respondent No. 2 - original complainant. They have filed consent terms. 2.

Respondent No. 2 submits that her grievance has been redressed and the petitioners have completed the construction work to her satisfaction.

3.

The dispute has arisen because of contract of civil work given by respondent No. 2 to the petitioners.

22. CRI WP 3292-19.doc 4.

In view of the statement made by respondent No. 2 and the consent terms filed, we find that nothing fruitful will come out from the prosecution.

5.

Accordingly, we quash and set aside the FIR bearing No. 17/19 registered with Sakinaka Police Station. 6.

The petition is allowed and accordingly disposed of. [ N.R. BORKAR, J. ] [ B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. ] by Ravindra M.

Amberkar Date:

2020.01.09 10:59:03 +0530 Ravindra M.

Amberkar