Upendra Kiku Patel v. Collector Of Daman And ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9458 OF 2017 Mayank C. Patel Petitioner V/s.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9123 OF 2019 Ramanbhai Karsanbhai Patel Petitioner V/s.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1729 OF 2021 Chandrakant Akhubhai Patel Petitioner V/s.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5005 OF 2019 Diwaliben Jerambhai Patel Petitioner V/s.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3528 OF 2021 Sureshbhai Ramanbhai Patel Petitioner V/s.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4996 OF 2019 Rameshbhai Kikabhai Patel Petitioner V/s.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7651 OF 2019 Rameshbhai Ranchhodbhai Patel Petitioner V/s.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8826 OF 2019 Laxmanbhai Mithalbhai Patel Petitioner V/s.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7055 OF 2019 Manilal Racchodbhai Patel Petitioner V/s.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9264 OF 2018 Upendra Kiku Patel Petitioner V/s.

------------------- Mr. Manoj M. Badgujar for the Petitioners.

Mr. H. Venegaonkar for Union of India.

Ms. Rupali Adhate for MCGM.

--------------------- CORAM :SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV & SURENDRA P. TAVADE, JJ.

DATED :JULY 30, 2021.

P.C. :

.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. He submits that during the pendency of these petitions, the award is passed. Therefore, the petitions have become infructuous. He also submits that the petitioners may be granted liberty to challenge the award, if advised so.

2.

In view of the above submission, the petitions are disposed of as infructuous. No order as to costs.

3.

The petitioners are at liberty to take appropriate proceedings in case they have any grievance about the award. (SURENDRA P. TAVADE, J) (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J)