Krushnat Jayram Fule v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

39 - WP. 3308-19 VPH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No. 3308 OF 2019 Krushnat Jayram Fule ...

Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

...

Respondents *** Mr. Parmeshwar Bhise, for the Petitioner.

Dr. F. R. Shaikh, APP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Sukhada V. Dalvi, for Respondent No. 3.

*** CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, & NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ.

DATE : NOVEMBER 25, 2019 PC :

1.

Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of parties, petition is taken up for fnal hearing. 2.

Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 3 are present with their respective advocates. They jointly state that matrimonial dispute between the parties is amicably settled and they are staying together.

3.

Respondent No. 3 has accordingly fled a separate afdavit. When she has been questioned in the Court, she accepted contents of the afdavit. In view of 1 / 2

39 - WP. 3308-19 the joint request, we make rule absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).

Sd/- Sd/- [NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.] [B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Vinayak Halemath 2 / 2