Veenu Krishnakumar Singh v. Krishnakumar Dinesh Kumar Singh And ORS

44. APPLN-177-2021.doc BDP-SPS-TAC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 177 OF 2021 by BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT Date: 2021.09.30 12:57:39 +0530 Smt. Veenu Krishnakumar Singh ....Applicant.

V/s Shri Krishnakumar Dinesh Kumar Singh and Ors.

.....Respondents Mr. A.S. Rao for the Applicant.

Mrs. J.S. Lohokare, APP for the Respondents/State. CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE: SEPTEMBER 29, 2021 P.C.:- 1] This is an application by the Complainant under sub-section (2) of Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code. 2] Heard Mr. Rao, learned Counsel for the Applicant. 3] While trying to make out a case for cancellation of bail, he would invite attention of this Court to the plea for bail resisted by the learned APP on the ground of requirement of custody for recovery of Streedhan, ornaments and vehicle etc. In response to the Court' s query, Mr. Rao fairly conceded that Accused has already approached 1/2

44. APPLN-177-2021.doc Court at Ayodhya under Section 13 for grant of divorce. 4] Since the Applicant has appropriate remedy for recovery of Streedhan and other articles, no case for indulgence is made out. Application fails and same stands rejected.

( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. ) 2/2