← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3191/2021allowed to be withdrawn

Kamal Mayaram Kanojia v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2021-09-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar2 pages

Sherla V.

27_wp.3191.2021.doc VISHWANATH SATYANARAYANA SHERLA Date: 2021.09.22 13:58:51 +0530

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE VISHWANATH SATYANARAYANA SHERLA CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3191 OF 2021 Kamal Mayaram Kanojia ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Others ... Respondents Mr.Shubham Gharbudave for the Petitioner Mrs.M.H. Mhatre, APP, for Respondent - State CORAM: S.S. SHINDE & N.J. JAMADAR, JJ.

DATED: SEPTEMBER 22, 2021 P.C.:

1.

Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Ms.Mhatre, the learned APP appearing for the Respondent - State.

2.

The learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to prefer an appeal against the impugned order passed by the Special Inspector General of Prisons, whereby the application of the petitioner for furlough leave came to be rejected. The learned Counsel for the

27_wp.3191.2021.doc petitioner submits that the petitioner will be satisfied if the appellate authority is directed to decide the appeal within a stipulated period.

3.

In view of the above, leave granted as prayed for. Let the Appeal be filed before the competent authority within a period of two weeks from today. In the event, the Appeal is filed within the aforesaid period, the appellate authority shall make an endeavour to decide the said appeal within a period of two weeks from the date of filing of the appeal.

4.

Writ Petition is accordingly disposed off with the aforesaid direction.

(N.J. JAMADAR, J.) (S.S. SHINDE, J.)