← Library
Bombay High CourtAPL/821/2016rule absolute

Dinesh Makani v. The State Of Maharashtra

2019-11-28Hon'Ble Smt. Justice S.S. Jadhav,Hon'Ble Shri Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari1 pages

34.apl821.16.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 821 OF 2016 Dinesh N. Makani.

...Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & ors.

...Respondents.

Mr. Jaymala Raut i/b. India Legal Solutions, advocate for applicant.

Mr. Prashant Badole, advocate for respondent No. 2. Dr. F.R. Shaikh, APP for State.

CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE : NOVEMBER 28, 2019.

P.C.:

Respondent No. 2 is present with his advocate. The applicant is present through advocate.

The parties state that dispute arising on account of parking space has been amicably settled. Affidavit sworn by complainant is presented in court. Complainant is secretary of society and has given oral no objection.

In this situation, accepting joint request, we make rule absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).

(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J) Talwalkar