Arunkumar Dinanath Pandey v. The State Of Maharashtra

Sherla V.

revn.352.2018_19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.352 OF 2018 Arunkumar Dinanath Pandey ... Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr.P.G. Pandey for Applicant Mr.A.R. Patil, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM: Mrs.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.

DATED: APRIL 1, 2019 P.C.:

1.

The learned Counsel for the applicant opened his arguments with a statement that charges are framed and, therefore, he wants to withdraw this revision application challenging the order of refusing discharge of the accused from the offences punishable under sections 376, 376(2)(n), 354©, 506(2), 328 of the Indian Penal Code r/w section 67(A) of the Information Technology Act and under sections 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 14 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act.

revn.352.2018_19.doc 2.

In view of the submission of the learned Counsel, the Revision application is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.

(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)