Sanjay Dattaram Haldankar Through Ca Sudesh Sanjay Haldankar v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS
1 8-15-WP-2536-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2514 OF 2022 Shivaji Dagdu Murkute Through Poa Sunil Shivaji Murkute
...Petitioner
Versus
State Of Maharashtra and Anr.
...Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2533 OF 2022 Shubhangi Shrikant Ghadshe
...Petitioner
Versus
State Of Maharashtra and Anr.
...Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2534 OF 2022 by DNYANESHWAR ASHOK ETHAPE Date: 2022.08.03 09:45:47 +0530 DNYANESHWAR ASHOK ETHAPE Meena Hasmukh Patel
...Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra and Ors
...Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2535 OF 2022 Sunita Gopal Gaikwad Through Poa Darshan Gopal Gaikwad
...Petitioner
Versus
State Of Maharashtra and Anr
...Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2536 OF 2022 Suresh Maruti Ghadshe
...Petitioner
Versus
State Of Maharashtra and Anr
...Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2537 OF 2022 Rajeshri Laxman Dalvi
...Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra and Ors
...Respondents
WITH
2 8-15-WP-2536-2022.doc CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2538 OF 2022 Suraj Subhas H Dhuri
...Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtr and Ors
...Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2539 OF 2022 Sanjay Dattaram Haldankar Through CA Sudesh Sanjay Haldankar
...Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra and Ors.
...Respondents
....
Mr. Vaibhav Birmole, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nimish Lotlikar i/by Santosh Pathak for respondent No. 2 to 7.
Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the Respondent - State in WP Nos.2514/2022, 2535/2022, 2537/2022, 2539/2022. Mr. S. R. Agarkar, APP for respondent/State in WP Nos.2533/2022 and 2536/2022.
Mr. A. R. Patil APP for Respondent/State in WP Nos.2534/2022, 2538/2022.
....
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATE : 1st AUGUST, 2022 PC :
1.
This petitions were listed for hearing on 27.07.2022. Considering the submissions of both sides, the Sessions Court was directed to decide the revision application preferred by respondent Nos. 3 to 7 on the next date of hearing within a period of one week from the date of receipt
3 8-15-WP-2536-2022.doc of the order.
2.
Order dated 27.07.2022 was not uploaded hence, the petitions were listed today for directions. None appears for respondents.
3.
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that revision application has been preferred by respondent Nos. 3 to 7 challenging issuance of non bailable warrant and the Sessions Court has granted stay to the execution of warrant. Except in Revision Application which is subject matter of Criminal Writ Petition No. 2536 of 2022. The interim relief was extended from time to time. The trial Court was under the belief that the entire proceedings before the trial Court are stayed and hence, matter did not proceed before the trial Court.
4.
Considering the aforesaid circumstances, the Sessions Court is directed to decide the revision application preferred by respondent Nos. 3 to 7 which are now due for hearing on 23.08.2022 on the said date or within a period of one week thereafter.
5.
Writ Petitions stand disposed of.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)