Sachin Pandurang Salunke v. Chandrakant A. Ninale And ORS

904 appa 1027-19=.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1027 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 726 OF 2019 Sachin Pandurang Salunke ... Applicant V/s.

Chandrakant A. Ninale and Ors.

... Respondents ---------------- Ms. Tahera A.R. Qureshi, appointed Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs. M.M. Deshmukh, APP for the Respondents.

---------------- CORAM : INDRAJIT MAHANTY & A.M.BADAR, JJ.

DATE : 28TH JUNE, 2019 P.C.

1.

Heard learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant as well as learned APP appearing for the State. Notice to other parties is not required because at the time of dismissal of the Appeal for want of prosecution, no notice so issued to them.

2.

Having considered the reasons stated in the application, we are of the opinion that sufficient cause is made out for appealing in the appeal when it was called out for hearing. The application is, therefore, allowed. The order dated 19.06.2019 dismissing the Sneha Chavan 1/2

904 appa 1027-19=.doc Appeal for want of prosecution is set aside. Appeal is restored to the file.

(A.M.BADAR, J) (INDRAJIT MAHANTY, J) Sneha Chavan 2/2