Vilas Laxman Chindarkar v. State Of Maharashtra And ORS

1/2 8 wp 2482.16.docx

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2482 OF 2016 Mr. Vilas Laxman Chindarkar ...

Petitioner v/s.

The State of Maharashtra & others ...

Respondents None for the Petitioner.

Mr. A.R. Kapadnis, APP for the State.

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE & R.N.LADDHA, JJ.

Digitally signed by LATA SUNIL PANJWANI Date:

2023.01.04 14:59:42 +0530 DATE : 3rd January 2023 LATA SUNIL PANJWANI P.C. :

None for the petitioner. Perused the prayer clause. The petitioner is seeking the directions to investigate the unauthorised occupation of the structure allegedly owned by respondent No.6 i.e. Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Development Authority. 2.

In our opinion, the petitioner has an alternate remedy to which he can take recourse to qua the relief claimed in the petition. As such the petition stands disposed of.

2/2 8 wp 2482.16.docx 3.

However, it is clarified that the petitioner's representation, if any, be decided by respondent No.6 expeditiously.

R.N. LADDHA, J.

NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

Lata Panjwani, P.S.